|
@@ -1,7 +1,20 @@
|
|
|
-\chapter{Pollard's $p+1$ factorization method}
|
|
|
+\chapter{Williams' $p+1$ factorization method \label{chap:william+1}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pollard!
|
|
|
+Analogously to Pollard's $p-1$ factorization described in chapter
|
|
|
+~\ref{chap:pollard-1}, this method will allow the determination of the divisor
|
|
|
+$p$ of a number $N$, if $p$ is such that $p+1$ has only small prime divisors.
|
|
|
+This method was presented in ~\cite{Williams:p+1} together with the results of
|
|
|
+the application of this method to a large number of composite numbers.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+\begin{remark}
|
|
|
+ In the end of ~\cite{Williams:p+1}, there is a small performance comparison
|
|
|
+ with Pollard's $p-1$:
|
|
|
+ ``The real problem with the $p+1$ test is the fact that it is quite slow. For
|
|
|
+ our program, we found that it was about nine times slower.''
|
|
|
+ Nevertheless, there is no further information about the way the two
|
|
|
+ factorization have been benchmarked.
|
|
|
+\end{remark}
|
|
|
%%% Local Variables:
|
|
|
%%% mode: latex
|
|
|
%%% TeX-master: "question_authority"
|
|
|
-%%% End:
|
|
|
+%%% End:
|